One-way sensitivity analysis scenarios showing whether gene therapy is cost-effective vs on-demand and prophylaxis FIX replacement upon changing 1 parameter at a time
Variations . | No. . | Altered parameter . | On-demand . | Prophylaxis . | Gene therapy . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard half-life FIX . | Extended half-life FIX . | Standard half-life FIX . | Extended half-life FIX . | Standard half-life FIX . | Extended half-life FIX . | ||||
(Approach A) . | (Approach B) . | (Approach C) . | (Approach D) . | (Approach E) . | (Approach F) . | ||||
Gene therapy effectiveness in IU/dL | 1 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 0 | Reference | ||||||
2 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 2, switch at 3 | $262 930 | Reference | $9 046 671 | |||||
3 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 1, switch at 3 | $126 952 | Reference | $9 180 457 | |||||
4 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 2, switch at 3 | $100 274 | $488 374 | Reference | $8 568 882 | ||||
5 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 1, switch at 15 | $140 009 | Reference | $9 605 377 | |||||
6 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 2, switch at 15 | $109 567 | $499 266 | Reference | $8 665 383 | ||||
7 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 1, switch at 15 | $176 396 | $573 397 | Reference | $8 635 833 | ||||
8 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 2, switch at 15 | $372 979 | $792 777 | $85 731 | $19 939 915 | Reference | $8 564 752 | ||
Cost in USD | 9 | Cost of gene therapy: Manufacturing cost | Reference | $25 560 300 | |||||
10 | Cost of gene therapy: $1 000 000 | Reference | $25 560 300 | ||||||
11 | Cost of gene therapy: $3 000 000 | Reference | $25 560 300 | ||||||
12 | Cost of FIX: 20% of wholesale acquisition cost | $35 486 | $116 709 | Reference | $4 481 850 | ||||
Age at infusion | 13 | Age at infusion: 25 y | Reference | $15 555 425 | |||||
14 | Age at infusion: 45 y | $379 654 | Reference | $14 020 363 | |||||
15 | Age at infusion: 65 y | $268 118 | $682 517 | $25 729 958 | Reference | $10 851 282 | |||
Failure rate | 16 | Post–gene therapy infusion failure rate 2% | Reference | $22 117 700 | |||||
17 | Post–gene therapy infusion failure rate 5% | Reference | $17 583 486 |
Variations . | No. . | Altered parameter . | On-demand . | Prophylaxis . | Gene therapy . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard half-life FIX . | Extended half-life FIX . | Standard half-life FIX . | Extended half-life FIX . | Standard half-life FIX . | Extended half-life FIX . | ||||
(Approach A) . | (Approach B) . | (Approach C) . | (Approach D) . | (Approach E) . | (Approach F) . | ||||
Gene therapy effectiveness in IU/dL | 1 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 0 | Reference | ||||||
2 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 2, switch at 3 | $262 930 | Reference | $9 046 671 | |||||
3 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 1, switch at 3 | $126 952 | Reference | $9 180 457 | |||||
4 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 2, switch at 3 | $100 274 | $488 374 | Reference | $8 568 882 | ||||
5 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 1, switch at 15 | $140 009 | Reference | $9 605 377 | |||||
6 | Starting level 34, annual decrement 2, switch at 15 | $109 567 | $499 266 | Reference | $8 665 383 | ||||
7 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 1, switch at 15 | $176 396 | $573 397 | Reference | $8 635 833 | ||||
8 | Starting level 23, annual decrement 2, switch at 15 | $372 979 | $792 777 | $85 731 | $19 939 915 | Reference | $8 564 752 | ||
Cost in USD | 9 | Cost of gene therapy: Manufacturing cost | Reference | $25 560 300 | |||||
10 | Cost of gene therapy: $1 000 000 | Reference | $25 560 300 | ||||||
11 | Cost of gene therapy: $3 000 000 | Reference | $25 560 300 | ||||||
12 | Cost of FIX: 20% of wholesale acquisition cost | $35 486 | $116 709 | Reference | $4 481 850 | ||||
Age at infusion | 13 | Age at infusion: 25 y | Reference | $15 555 425 | |||||
14 | Age at infusion: 45 y | $379 654 | Reference | $14 020 363 | |||||
15 | Age at infusion: 65 y | $268 118 | $682 517 | $25 729 958 | Reference | $10 851 282 | |||
Failure rate | 16 | Post–gene therapy infusion failure rate 2% | Reference | $22 117 700 | |||||
17 | Post–gene therapy infusion failure rate 5% | Reference | $17 583 486 |
▪ Gene therapy approach with the lower cost per QALY was used as the reference and compared to the 5 other approaches.
▪ Gene therapy reference treatment approach is dominant (less costly and yields more QALYs).
▪ Gene therapy reference treatment approach is more costly but remained cost-effective considering a $150 000/QALY threshold.
▪ Gene therapy reference treatment approach is not cost-effective considering a $150 000/QALY threshold.
▪ Gene therapy reference treatment approach yields less QALYs but remains cost-effective considering a $150 000/QALY threshold.
Detailed results are presented in supplemental Table 14.