Table 1.

Pearson χ2 comparison of acute leukemia clinical trial enrollment fractions according to race-ethnicity

StatisticNH-WhiteNH-BlackNH-NA/ANNH-AsianHispanic
AML 
 Proportion of trial enrollment, % 79.7 7.3 0.3 3.6 
 Enrollment fraction, % 3.5 2.4 1.8 2.6 2.9 
 OR of enrollment Ref 0.68 0.31 0.75 0.83 
 OR 95% CI – 0.61, 0.75 0.31, 0.82 0.65, 0.86 0.76, 0.91 
 P – <.001 .005 <.001 <.001 
ALL 
 Proportion of trial enrollment, % 65.4 7.7 0.3 4.1 22.5 
 Enrollment fraction, % 3.6 2.7 2.4 2.3 
 OR of enrollment Ref 0.74 0.27 0.67 0.64 
 OR 95% CI – 0.63, 0.87 0.12, 0.61 0.54, 0.83 0.57, 0.71 
 P – <.001 .001 <.001 <.001 
StatisticNH-WhiteNH-BlackNH-NA/ANNH-AsianHispanic
AML 
 Proportion of trial enrollment, % 79.7 7.3 0.3 3.6 
 Enrollment fraction, % 3.5 2.4 1.8 2.6 2.9 
 OR of enrollment Ref 0.68 0.31 0.75 0.83 
 OR 95% CI – 0.61, 0.75 0.31, 0.82 0.65, 0.86 0.76, 0.91 
 P – <.001 .005 <.001 <.001 
ALL 
 Proportion of trial enrollment, % 65.4 7.7 0.3 4.1 22.5 
 Enrollment fraction, % 3.6 2.7 2.4 2.3 
 OR of enrollment Ref 0.74 0.27 0.67 0.64 
 OR 95% CI – 0.63, 0.87 0.12, 0.61 0.54, 0.83 0.57, 0.71 
 P – <.001 .001 <.001 <.001 

ClinicalTrials.gov trials from 2002 to 2017 reporting race and ethnicity data. AML, n = 6554; ALL, n = 4149. Significant results are listed in bold. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal