Table 6.

Patient preferences for treatment objectives and patient vs physician perceptions of chance of cure among patients with AML-CM ≥4 according to therapy given

Patients, %
Objective ranking*FirstSecondThirdP
 Cure    .02 
  Less intensive 69 15 16  
  Intensive 82  
 QOL    .03 
  Less intensive 44 42 13  
  Intensive 33 42 25  
 LOL    .77 
  Less intensive 33 24 42  
  Intensive 32 28 40  
More important objective     
 Cure vs QOL Cure Equal QOL .0004 
  Less intensive 49 21 30  
  Intensive 63 25 13  
 Cure vs LOL Cure Equal LOL .16 
  Less intensive 56 24 20  
  Intensive 63 25 12  
 QOL vs LOL QOL Equal LOL .23 
  Less intensive 54 25 21  
  Intensive 45 26 30  
Chance of cure Good (>74) Maybe (25-74) Poor (<25)  
 Patient belief    .0006 
  Less intensive 48 42 10  
  Intensive 67 29  
 Physician belief    <.0001 
  Less intensive 33 66  
  Intensive 71 21  
Patients, %
Objective ranking*FirstSecondThirdP
 Cure    .02 
  Less intensive 69 15 16  
  Intensive 82  
 QOL    .03 
  Less intensive 44 42 13  
  Intensive 33 42 25  
 LOL    .77 
  Less intensive 33 24 42  
  Intensive 32 28 40  
More important objective     
 Cure vs QOL Cure Equal QOL .0004 
  Less intensive 49 21 30  
  Intensive 63 25 13  
 Cure vs LOL Cure Equal LOL .16 
  Less intensive 56 24 20  
  Intensive 63 25 12  
 QOL vs LOL QOL Equal LOL .23 
  Less intensive 54 25 21  
  Intensive 45 26 30  
Chance of cure Good (>74) Maybe (25-74) Poor (<25)  
 Patient belief    .0006 
  Less intensive 48 42 10  
  Intensive 67 29  
 Physician belief    <.0001 
  Less intensive 33 66  
  Intensive 71 21  

LOL, length of life.

*

First indicates highest preference.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal