Table 3.

Survival rates and HRs for mortality in recipients of less-intensive vs intensive induction therapies within the retrospective cohort

2-y OS, %UnadjustedAdjusted for HCT as time-dependent covariate
AML-CMLess intensiveIntensiveHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
4-6 29 56 1.82 (1.25-2.63) .002 1.82 (1.25-2.63) .002 
7-9 17 36 1.79 (1.32-2.44) .0002 1.67 (1.22-2.27) .002 
≥10 22 1.43 (1.08-1.89) .01 1.32 (0.99-1.72) .06 
Missing 24 49 2.04 (1.37-3.13) .0006 — — 
2-y OS, %UnadjustedAdjusted for HCT as time-dependent covariate
AML-CMLess intensiveIntensiveHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
4-6 29 56 1.82 (1.25-2.63) .002 1.82 (1.25-2.63) .002 
7-9 17 36 1.79 (1.32-2.44) .0002 1.67 (1.22-2.27) .002 
≥10 22 1.43 (1.08-1.89) .01 1.32 (0.99-1.72) .06 
Missing 24 49 2.04 (1.37-3.13) .0006 — — 

Comparisons stratified according to AML-CM score. No comparisons were performed for patients with AML-CM score ≤3 because 99% received intensive therapies. HR comparisons are both unadjusted and adjusted for undergoing allogeneic HCT as time-dependent covariate. Higher HR indicates increased mortality with less-intensive therapies.

OS, overall survival.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal