Self-reported impact of CRTI (N = 321)
Characteristic . | No. (%) . |
---|---|
Instrumental to retention in hematology research | |
Strongly disagree | 6 (1.9) |
Disagree | 14 (4.4) |
Neutral | 51 (15.9) |
Agree | 111 (34.6) |
Strongly agree | 139 (43.3) |
CRTI facilitated career development in research | |
Strongly disagree | 5 (1.6) |
Disagree | 13 (4.0) |
Neutral | 35 (10.9) |
Agree | 108 (33.6) |
Strongly agree | 160 (49.8) |
Allowed better understanding of requirements to succeed in research | |
Strongly disagree | 5 (1.6) |
Disagree | 4 (1.2) |
Neutral | 16 (5.0) |
Agree | 115 (35.8) |
Strongly agree | 181 (56.4) |
CRTI increased feeling connected to investigators in hematology | |
Strongly disagree | 5 (1.6) |
Disagree | 6 (1.9) |
Neutral | 21 (6.5) |
Agree | 79 (24.6) |
Strongly agree | 210 (65.4) |
Since CRTI, I continue to feel connected to investigators in hematology | |
Strongly disagree | 0 |
Disagree | 6 (1.9) |
Neutral | 16 (5.0) |
Agree | 89 (27.7) |
Strongly Agree | 178 (55.5) |
NA | 32 (10.0) |
Characteristic . | No. (%) . |
---|---|
Instrumental to retention in hematology research | |
Strongly disagree | 6 (1.9) |
Disagree | 14 (4.4) |
Neutral | 51 (15.9) |
Agree | 111 (34.6) |
Strongly agree | 139 (43.3) |
CRTI facilitated career development in research | |
Strongly disagree | 5 (1.6) |
Disagree | 13 (4.0) |
Neutral | 35 (10.9) |
Agree | 108 (33.6) |
Strongly agree | 160 (49.8) |
Allowed better understanding of requirements to succeed in research | |
Strongly disagree | 5 (1.6) |
Disagree | 4 (1.2) |
Neutral | 16 (5.0) |
Agree | 115 (35.8) |
Strongly agree | 181 (56.4) |
CRTI increased feeling connected to investigators in hematology | |
Strongly disagree | 5 (1.6) |
Disagree | 6 (1.9) |
Neutral | 21 (6.5) |
Agree | 79 (24.6) |
Strongly agree | 210 (65.4) |
Since CRTI, I continue to feel connected to investigators in hematology | |
Strongly disagree | 0 |
Disagree | 6 (1.9) |
Neutral | 16 (5.0) |
Agree | 89 (27.7) |
Strongly Agree | 178 (55.5) |
NA | 32 (10.0) |