Comparison of average number and size of CNAs between non-ETP T-LLy and ETP-LLy
| . | Average no. of CNAs per case . | . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | One copy gain . | Two or more copy gain . | Heterozygous loss . | Biallelic loss . | Total CNAs . | Average size of CNAs per case (Mb) . |
| Non-ETP T-LLy | 1.40 | 0.33 | 1.93 | 0.93 | 4.6 | 70.30 |
| ETP-LLy | 1.89 | 0.11 | 4.78 | 1 | 7.78 | 160.66 |
| P value | 0.65 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.85 | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| . | Average no. of CNAs per case . | . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | One copy gain . | Two or more copy gain . | Heterozygous loss . | Biallelic loss . | Total CNAs . | Average size of CNAs per case (Mb) . |
| Non-ETP T-LLy | 1.40 | 0.33 | 1.93 | 0.93 | 4.6 | 70.30 |
| ETP-LLy | 1.89 | 0.11 | 4.78 | 1 | 7.78 | 160.66 |
| P value | 0.65 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.85 | 0.19 | 0.23 |
Mb, megabases of genome involved.