Table 3.

Characteristics of FLT3-ITD at diagnosis between patients treated with midostaurin that were FLT3-ITD positive vs negative at the time of disease progression

VariablePatients treated with midostaurin (n = 54)P
FLT3-ITD positive at disease progression (n = 29)FLT3-ITD negative at disease progression (n = 25)
Pts with multiple ITDs, n (%) 10 (34) 5 (20) .36 
Total number of ITDs, n 43 31 ND 
FLT3-ITD AR    
 Median (range) 0.62 (0.10-4.32) 0.39 (0.06-0.96) .03 
FLT3-ITD nt length    
 Median (range) 57 (18-225) 51 (21-198) .69 
FLT3-ITD insertion sites, n (%)   .63 
 JMD 27 (63) 17 (55) 
 JM-Z 17 (40) 12 (39) 
 JM-S 1 (2) 1 (3) 
 Hinge region 9 (21) 4 (13) 
 TKD1 16 (37) 14 (45) 
 Beta1-sheet 15 (35) 14 (45) 
 Nucleotide binding loop 1 (2) 0 (0) 
VariablePatients treated with midostaurin (n = 54)P
FLT3-ITD positive at disease progression (n = 29)FLT3-ITD negative at disease progression (n = 25)
Pts with multiple ITDs, n (%) 10 (34) 5 (20) .36 
Total number of ITDs, n 43 31 ND 
FLT3-ITD AR    
 Median (range) 0.62 (0.10-4.32) 0.39 (0.06-0.96) .03 
FLT3-ITD nt length    
 Median (range) 57 (18-225) 51 (21-198) .69 
FLT3-ITD insertion sites, n (%)   .63 
 JMD 27 (63) 17 (55) 
 JM-Z 17 (40) 12 (39) 
 JM-S 1 (2) 1 (3) 
 Hinge region 9 (21) 4 (13) 
 TKD1 16 (37) 14 (45) 
 Beta1-sheet 15 (35) 14 (45) 
 Nucleotide binding loop 1 (2) 0 (0) 

JMD, juxtamembrane domain; NA, not available; ND, not determined; nt, nucleotide.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal