Table 4.

MVA of survival outcomes in patients with t(8;21)

CovariateHR95% CIP
t(8;21) DFS    
 Hypodiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.414 0.210-0.815 .011 
 Hyperdiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.386 0.139-1.073 .068 
 Deletion of 9q 0.451 0.200-1.014 .054 
 Presence of secondary chromosomal abnormalities 1.053 0.541-2.050 .879 
t(8;21) OS  
 Hypodiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.482 0.216-1.074 .074 
 Hyperdiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.264 0.070-0.991 .049 
 Deletion of 7q 1.516 0.589-3.899 .388 
 Deletion of 9q 0.367 0.143-0.942 .037 
 Presence of secondary chromosomal abnormalities 0.943 0.410-2.143 .888 
CovariateHR95% CIP
t(8;21) DFS    
 Hypodiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.414 0.210-0.815 .011 
 Hyperdiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.386 0.139-1.073 .068 
 Deletion of 9q 0.451 0.200-1.014 .054 
 Presence of secondary chromosomal abnormalities 1.053 0.541-2.050 .879 
t(8;21) OS  
 Hypodiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.482 0.216-1.074 .074 
 Hyperdiploidy vs pseudodiploidy 0.264 0.070-0.991 .049 
 Deletion of 7q 1.516 0.589-3.899 .388 
 Deletion of 9q 0.367 0.143-0.942 .037 
 Presence of secondary chromosomal abnormalities 0.943 0.410-2.143 .888 

All MVAs were adjusted for age, WBC count at diagnosis, and KIT mutation (positive, negative, and not tested).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal