Table 2

OS based on stage migration

Modified Mayo 2004 stageMayo 2012 stage
OS (years) if stage changed from:Same vs worsenedSame vs improvedSame vs worsenedSame vs improved
Baseline to 3 mo 10.5 vs 4.0; P < .001 10.5 vs 10.8; P = .27 9.8 vs 4.0; P = .01 9.8 vs 10.5; P = .21 
Baseline to 6 mo 8.1 vs 5.1; P = .004 8.1 vs NR; P = .08 NR vs 3.8; P < .001 NR vs 8.1; P = .47 
Baseline to 3 mo restricting to > stage 2 patients Not assessed 3.5 vs 10.8; P < .001 Not assessed 2.6 vs 8.1; P < .001 
Baseline to 6 mo restricting to > stage 2 patients Not assessed 5.0 vs NR; P = .02 Not assessed 3.7 vs 5.9; P = .12 
Modified Mayo 2004 stageMayo 2012 stage
OS (years) if stage changed from:Same vs worsenedSame vs improvedSame vs worsenedSame vs improved
Baseline to 3 mo 10.5 vs 4.0; P < .001 10.5 vs 10.8; P = .27 9.8 vs 4.0; P = .01 9.8 vs 10.5; P = .21 
Baseline to 6 mo 8.1 vs 5.1; P = .004 8.1 vs NR; P = .08 NR vs 3.8; P < .001 NR vs 8.1; P = .47 
Baseline to 3 mo restricting to > stage 2 patients Not assessed 3.5 vs 10.8; P < .001 Not assessed 2.6 vs 8.1; P < .001 
Baseline to 6 mo restricting to > stage 2 patients Not assessed 5.0 vs NR; P = .02 Not assessed 3.7 vs 5.9; P = .12 

The impact of improving, worsening, or retaining original stage at 3 and 6 mo in the entire cohort, and in patients who had advanced stage at diagnosis.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal