Table 1.

Clinical trials, systematic review and meta-analyses, and observational studies

StudyStudy designStudiesPopulationInterventionComparatorEfficacy outcomesSafety outcomes
Clinical trials        
 Fullen et al 1973 Quasi-RCT N/A Traumatic fracture of the proximal femur without VTE Permanent IVCF (n = 41) No IVCF (n = 59) PE: 4 (10%) in IVCF group vs 19 (32%) in non-IVCF group Mortality: 4 (10%) in IVCF group vs 14 (24%) in non-IVCF group IVCF complications: none reported in either group 
 Rajasekhar et al 2011 Randomized pilot feasibility study N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE Retrievable IVCF and anticoagulant prophylaxis (n = 18) Standard anticoagulant VTE prophylaxis (n = 16) PE: 0 in IVCF group vs 1 in non-IVCF group DVT: 1 in IVCF group vs 0 in non-IVCF group 
Mortality: 1 in IVCF group vs 0 in non-IVCF group IVCF retrieval: 0% at 3 mo; 15% at 6 mo 
 Ho et al 2019 RCT N/A High-risk trauma patient (ISS > 15) without VTE and contraindication to AC Retrievable IVCF (n = 122) No IVCF (n = 118) 90-d composite symptomatic PE or mortality: 17 (13.9%) in IVCF group vs 17 (14.4%) in non-IVCF group (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.51-1.94; P = .98) Symptomatic PE (after 7 d with continued contraindication to AC): 0 in IVCF group vs 5 in non-IVCF group (RR 0, 95% CI 0.00-0.55) 
Mortality: 16 (13.1%) of IVCF group vs 11 (9.3%) of non-IVCF group (RR 1.41; 95% CI 0.69-2.87) IVCF complications (at time of filter retrieval): 15% 
90-d IVCF retrieval: 71 of 108 (66%) 
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses        
 Rajasekhar et al 2011 Systematic review and meta-analysis 7 observational cohort studies High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 428) (6 studies with permanent IVCFs, 1 not reported) and anticoagulant prophylaxis (in 5 studies) No IVCF (n = 1472) and anticoagulant prophylaxis (in 5 studies) PE: 4 of 428 (0.9%) in IVCF group vs 76 of 1472 (5%) in non-IVCF group (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.09-0.49) DVT*: 17 of 94 (18%) in IVCF group vs 18 of 138 (13%) in non-IVCF group (OR 1.6; 95% CI 0.76-3.37) 
 Singh et al 2013 Systematic review and meta-analysis 8 controlled studies: 1 pilot feasibility, 7 observational; 2 excluded from meta-analysis Mixed trauma patient IVCF (2 permanent IVCF; 6 not reported) (n = 432) No IVCF (i.e. mechanical ± anticoagulant prophylaxis) (n = 4160) PE*: 2 of 334 (0.5%) in IVCF group vs 48 of 730 (6.5%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.70) Fatal PE*: 0 of 163 (0%) in IVCF group vs 20 of 407 (4.9%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.81) 
Mortality*: 21 of 166 (12.6%) in IVCF group vs 60 of 312 (19.2%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.7; 95% CI 0.4-1.23) DVT*: 18 of 112 (16%) in IVCF group vs 18 of 154 (11.7%) in non-IVCF group (RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.49-6.18; P = .38) 
Filter complication* 1.0%-5.7% 
 Haut et al 2014 Systematic review and meta-analysis 8 controlled studies: 1 pilot feasibility, 7 observational – 2 excluded from meta-analysis Mixed trauma patient IVCF and standard VTE prophylaxis (n = 334) Standard VTE prophylaxis (n = 730) PE: 2 (0.5%) in IVCF group vs 48 (6.5%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.70) Fatal PE*: 0 in IVCF group vs 20 of 407 (4.9%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.81) 
Mortality*: RR 0.70 [95% CI 0.4-1.23] DVT*: RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.50-6.19, P = .38) 
 Shariff et al 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis 10 controlled studies: 2 RCTs, 8 observational studies High-risk trauma patients (ISS > 15 or trauma delaying initiation of VTE prophylaxis) IVCF (n = 573) Standard VTE prophylaxis (n = 1717) Symptomatic PE: 5 (0.87%) in IVCF group vs 90 (5.2%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12-0.58; P < 0.05) Fatal PE*: 0 in IVCF group vs 23 of 619 (3.7%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.08-1.10; P = .07) 
Observational studies        
 Batty et al 2012 Prospective cohort study with concurrent controls N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 511) No IVCF (n = 5833) PE: OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.088-0.890; P = .031 NR 
 Hemmila et al 201510  Retrospective cohort study N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 803) No IVCF (n = 39456) PE: 9 (1.1%) in IVCF group vs 187 (0.5%) in non-IVCF group (P = .01) DVT: 54 (6.7%) in IVCF group vs 483 (1.2%) in non-IVCF group (P < .001) 
Mortality: 42 (5.2%) in IVCF group vs 1369 (3.5%) in non-IVCF group (P = .01) 
 Sarosiek et al 201711  Retrospective cohort study N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 451) No IVCF (n = 1343) Mortality: IVCF group with higher mortality than non-IVCF group (P = .14) NR 
StudyStudy designStudiesPopulationInterventionComparatorEfficacy outcomesSafety outcomes
Clinical trials        
 Fullen et al 1973 Quasi-RCT N/A Traumatic fracture of the proximal femur without VTE Permanent IVCF (n = 41) No IVCF (n = 59) PE: 4 (10%) in IVCF group vs 19 (32%) in non-IVCF group Mortality: 4 (10%) in IVCF group vs 14 (24%) in non-IVCF group IVCF complications: none reported in either group 
 Rajasekhar et al 2011 Randomized pilot feasibility study N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE Retrievable IVCF and anticoagulant prophylaxis (n = 18) Standard anticoagulant VTE prophylaxis (n = 16) PE: 0 in IVCF group vs 1 in non-IVCF group DVT: 1 in IVCF group vs 0 in non-IVCF group 
Mortality: 1 in IVCF group vs 0 in non-IVCF group IVCF retrieval: 0% at 3 mo; 15% at 6 mo 
 Ho et al 2019 RCT N/A High-risk trauma patient (ISS > 15) without VTE and contraindication to AC Retrievable IVCF (n = 122) No IVCF (n = 118) 90-d composite symptomatic PE or mortality: 17 (13.9%) in IVCF group vs 17 (14.4%) in non-IVCF group (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.51-1.94; P = .98) Symptomatic PE (after 7 d with continued contraindication to AC): 0 in IVCF group vs 5 in non-IVCF group (RR 0, 95% CI 0.00-0.55) 
Mortality: 16 (13.1%) of IVCF group vs 11 (9.3%) of non-IVCF group (RR 1.41; 95% CI 0.69-2.87) IVCF complications (at time of filter retrieval): 15% 
90-d IVCF retrieval: 71 of 108 (66%) 
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses        
 Rajasekhar et al 2011 Systematic review and meta-analysis 7 observational cohort studies High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 428) (6 studies with permanent IVCFs, 1 not reported) and anticoagulant prophylaxis (in 5 studies) No IVCF (n = 1472) and anticoagulant prophylaxis (in 5 studies) PE: 4 of 428 (0.9%) in IVCF group vs 76 of 1472 (5%) in non-IVCF group (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.09-0.49) DVT*: 17 of 94 (18%) in IVCF group vs 18 of 138 (13%) in non-IVCF group (OR 1.6; 95% CI 0.76-3.37) 
 Singh et al 2013 Systematic review and meta-analysis 8 controlled studies: 1 pilot feasibility, 7 observational; 2 excluded from meta-analysis Mixed trauma patient IVCF (2 permanent IVCF; 6 not reported) (n = 432) No IVCF (i.e. mechanical ± anticoagulant prophylaxis) (n = 4160) PE*: 2 of 334 (0.5%) in IVCF group vs 48 of 730 (6.5%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.70) Fatal PE*: 0 of 163 (0%) in IVCF group vs 20 of 407 (4.9%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.81) 
Mortality*: 21 of 166 (12.6%) in IVCF group vs 60 of 312 (19.2%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.7; 95% CI 0.4-1.23) DVT*: 18 of 112 (16%) in IVCF group vs 18 of 154 (11.7%) in non-IVCF group (RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.49-6.18; P = .38) 
Filter complication* 1.0%-5.7% 
 Haut et al 2014 Systematic review and meta-analysis 8 controlled studies: 1 pilot feasibility, 7 observational – 2 excluded from meta-analysis Mixed trauma patient IVCF and standard VTE prophylaxis (n = 334) Standard VTE prophylaxis (n = 730) PE: 2 (0.5%) in IVCF group vs 48 (6.5%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.70) Fatal PE*: 0 in IVCF group vs 20 of 407 (4.9%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.81) 
Mortality*: RR 0.70 [95% CI 0.4-1.23] DVT*: RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.50-6.19, P = .38) 
 Shariff et al 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis 10 controlled studies: 2 RCTs, 8 observational studies High-risk trauma patients (ISS > 15 or trauma delaying initiation of VTE prophylaxis) IVCF (n = 573) Standard VTE prophylaxis (n = 1717) Symptomatic PE: 5 (0.87%) in IVCF group vs 90 (5.2%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12-0.58; P < 0.05) Fatal PE*: 0 in IVCF group vs 23 of 619 (3.7%) in non-IVCF group (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.08-1.10; P = .07) 
Observational studies        
 Batty et al 2012 Prospective cohort study with concurrent controls N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 511) No IVCF (n = 5833) PE: OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.088-0.890; P = .031 NR 
 Hemmila et al 201510  Retrospective cohort study N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 803) No IVCF (n = 39456) PE: 9 (1.1%) in IVCF group vs 187 (0.5%) in non-IVCF group (P = .01) DVT: 54 (6.7%) in IVCF group vs 483 (1.2%) in non-IVCF group (P < .001) 
Mortality: 42 (5.2%) in IVCF group vs 1369 (3.5%) in non-IVCF group (P = .01) 
 Sarosiek et al 201711  Retrospective cohort study N/A High-risk trauma patient without VTE IVCF (n = 451) No IVCF (n = 1343) Mortality: IVCF group with higher mortality than non-IVCF group (P = .14) NR 

AC, anticoagulation; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ISS, Injury Severity Score; N/A, not applicable; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk.

*

Outcome not reported in all studies.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal