Table 4.

Randomized phase 2 and 3 studies evaluating pomalidomide-based triplets in patients with RRMM

isa-Pd vs Pd28 PCd vs Pd29 elo-Pd vs Pd33 
Phase Randomized phase 3 Randomized phase 2 Randomized phase 2 
No. of patients 307 70 117 
Median of prior lines 
Len-refractory, % 93 100 87 
Bort-refractory, % 76* 74 80* 
Median follow-up, mo 11.6 Not reported Minimum follow-up of 9.1 mo 
≥PR, % 60 vs 35 65 vs 39 53 vs 26 
≥VGPR, % 32 vs 9 12 vs 14 20 vs 9 
Median PFS, mo 11.5 vs 6.5 9.5 vs 4.4 10.3 vs 4.7 mo 
Median OS, mo 1-y OS: 72% vs 63% Not reached vs 16.8 Not reached in both arms 
Approval FDA/EMA — FDA/EMA 
isa-Pd vs Pd28 PCd vs Pd29 elo-Pd vs Pd33 
Phase Randomized phase 3 Randomized phase 2 Randomized phase 2 
No. of patients 307 70 117 
Median of prior lines 
Len-refractory, % 93 100 87 
Bort-refractory, % 76* 74 80* 
Median follow-up, mo 11.6 Not reported Minimum follow-up of 9.1 mo 
≥PR, % 60 vs 35 65 vs 39 53 vs 26 
≥VGPR, % 32 vs 9 12 vs 14 20 vs 9 
Median PFS, mo 11.5 vs 6.5 9.5 vs 4.4 10.3 vs 4.7 mo 
Median OS, mo 1-y OS: 72% vs 63% Not reached vs 16.8 Not reached in both arms 
Approval FDA/EMA — FDA/EMA 

—, no approval by FDA/EMA; Bort, bortezomib; elo-Pd, elotuzumab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone; isa-Pd, isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone; Len, lenalidomide; PCd, pomalidomide-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone; Pd, pomalidomide-dexamethasone.

*

Refractory to at least 1 PI.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal