Table 2.

Characteristics and efficacy outcomes in patients with informative rebiopsy

Patient no.ArmStageRemission status at first interim restaging*SPD reduction at first interim restaging (%)DS at first nterim restagingFinal remission statusObservation time without PFS event
IIB CR −97.34 CR 20.5 
IIB PR −72.31 CR 22.3 
IIA CR −100 CR 9.7 
IIA CR −72.14 CR 12.7 
IIAE CR −84.59 CR 21.0 
IIB PR −77.13 CR 19.0 
10 IIA CR −89.49 CR 9.0 
11 IIA CR −75.64 CR 15.1 
13 IIB CR −78.64 CR 13.8 
14 IIB CR −87.72 CR 8.2 
Patient no.ArmStageRemission status at first interim restaging*SPD reduction at first interim restaging (%)DS at first nterim restagingFinal remission statusObservation time without PFS event
IIB CR −97.34 CR 20.5 
IIB PR −72.31 CR 22.3 
IIA CR −100 CR 9.7 
IIA CR −72.14 CR 12.7 
IIAE CR −84.59 CR 21.0 
IIB PR −77.13 CR 19.0 
10 IIA CR −89.49 CR 9.0 
11 IIA CR −75.64 CR 15.1 
13 IIB CR −78.64 CR 13.8 
14 IIB CR −87.72 CR 8.2 

Treatment arm A received 4xN-AVD + 30-Gy IS-RT. Treatment arm B received 4xnivolumab + 2xN-AVD + 2xAVD + 30-Gy IS-RT.

DS, Deauville score; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SPD, sum of product of greatest diameter, as measured by computed tomography scan.

*

Centrally reviewed first interim restaging after 2xN-AVD or 4xnivolumab in treatment groups A and B, respectively.

No patient experienced disease progression or relapse so far (data cutoff for PFS calculations was 25 October 2019).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal