Table 2.

Concordance rates according to any mutation, DNMT3A, TET2, “DTA mutations,” and maximum clone size <10%

MZDZ
Number of pairsConcordant pairsDiscordant pairscc rateNumber of pairsConcordant pairsDiscordant pairscc rateP for ccMZ = ccDZ
VariableNNNpc (95% CI)NNNpc (95% CI)P
Any mutation (yes/no) 81 20 61 0.40 (0.32; 0.49) 89 23 66 0.40 (0.32; 0.49) 
TET2 mutation (yes/no) 35 31 0.20 (0.10; 0.34) 38 34 0.20 (0.10; 0.34) 
DNMT3A mutation (yes/no) 41 35 0.25 (0.12; 0.43) 50 44 0.22 (0.11; 0.40) .86 
“Only TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1” vs “no mutation” 65 14 51 0.33 (0.24; 0.43) 63 11 52 0.33 (0.24; 0.43) 
“Max VAF <10%” vs “no mutation” 57 11 46 0.28 (0.25; 0.32) 57 50 0.28 (0.25; 0.32) .99 
MZDZ
Number of pairsConcordant pairsDiscordant pairscc rateNumber of pairsConcordant pairsDiscordant pairscc rateP for ccMZ = ccDZ
VariableNNNpc (95% CI)NNNpc (95% CI)P
Any mutation (yes/no) 81 20 61 0.40 (0.32; 0.49) 89 23 66 0.40 (0.32; 0.49) 
TET2 mutation (yes/no) 35 31 0.20 (0.10; 0.34) 38 34 0.20 (0.10; 0.34) 
DNMT3A mutation (yes/no) 41 35 0.25 (0.12; 0.43) 50 44 0.22 (0.11; 0.40) .86 
“Only TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1” vs “no mutation” 65 14 51 0.33 (0.24; 0.43) 63 11 52 0.33 (0.24; 0.43) 
“Max VAF <10%” vs “no mutation” 57 11 46 0.28 (0.25; 0.32) 57 50 0.28 (0.25; 0.32) .99 

Casewise concordance (cc) rates were calculated to estimate a genetic predisposition. If the cc rates are higher in the MZ twins compared with DZ twins, it indicates a genetic predisposition to the variable. We did not find any difference in the cc rates between MZ or DZ in any of the tested variables.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal